What is meant by technologies of the self?
“Foucault defined technologies of the self as techniques that allow individuals to effect by their own means a certain number of operations on their own bodies, minds, souls, and lifestyle, so as to transform themselves in order to attain a certain state of happiness, and quality of life.”
What was Foucault’s idea of the care of the self?
Foucault defines the care of the self in terms of “those intentional and voluntary actions by which men not only set themselves rules of conduct, but also seek to transform themselves, to change themselves in their singular being, and to make their life into an oeuvre” (1986: 10).
What is technologies of the self examples?
Capitalism, digital media and electronic devices, religion, and psychotherapy are contemporary examples of technologies of the self.
What are the technologies of the self according to Foucault’s 1998 *?
Foucault defines “technologies of the self” as “reflected and voluntary practices by which men not only fix rules of conduct for themselves but seek to transform themselves, to change themselves in their particular being, and to make their life an oeuvre” [1].
What is Biopower according to Foucault?
Foucault’s concept of biopower describes the administration and regulation of human life at the level of the population and the individual body – it is a form of power that targets the population (Rogers et al 2013).
What are some examples of biopower?
Regulation of customs, habits, health, reproductive practices, family, “blood”, and “well-being” would be straightforward examples of biopower, as would any conception of the state as a “body” and the use of state power as essential to its “life”.
What does Foucault mean by biopower and biopolitics?
In the work of Foucault, biopolitics refers to the style of government that regulates populations through “biopower” (the application and impact of political power on all aspects of human life).
What is Subjectification power?
In the Afterword in which Foucault defines subjectification, he writes of power that, “it incites, it induces, it seduces, it makes easier or more difficult; in the extreme it constrains or forbids, absolutely; it is nevertheless always a way of acting upon a subject or acting subjects by virtue of their acting or …